Regular readers know I have this thing about libraries. They tend to be the one governmental function that has taken it upon themselves to deny their taxpayers access for spurious reasons: visiting barefoot. Even worse, you’d think a place dedicated to providing access to learning would make an effort to learn something themselves, but instead, when challenged, they double down.
So, here’s a short look at one library’s change in accepting bare feet.
Today I’m going to look at the Cincinnati Public Library. Most of the pictures comes from a book on its history: Free & Public: One Hundred and Fifty Years at the Public Library of Cincinnati and Hamilton County, 1853-2003.
The library was created in 1874, with a huge building in downtown Cincinnati. That lasted until 1955, when a new (and the present) building was constructed. Of course, during that time period, kids went barefoot all summer long. Do you think a library would keep them out?
I’ve written before about how, in Boston in 1887, the English poet Matthew Arnold visited and was struck by how egalitarian we were. Part of his proof? He visited a library’s reading room and saw a barefoot boy there reading a book:
I do not think I have been so impressed with anything else that I have seen since arriving in this country as I am now with meeting this barefooted boy in this reading-room. What a tribute to democratic institutions it is to say that instead of sending that boy out to wander alone in the streets, they permit him to come in here and excite his youthful imagination by reading such a book as the “Life of Washington!”
You can read more of that article here.
Now, in Cincinnati, one of the things they experimented with was, not only having branch locations, but having what they called “deposit stations”. Deposit stations were small bookshelves located in other public buildings, or even commercial establishments, where folks could come look at and check out books. So you’d see something like this one in (in this case) a plumbing and gas fitting store. This is from the year 1911.

Librarian Whelpley thought that many small deposit stations like this one in a plumber’s supply store would reach far more readers than a few expensive branch libraries.
[Caption from the book. Click for larger version.]
Of course you’d see barefoot kids in there. Local stores didn’t care one whit whether their visitors were barefoot.
Did they have rules against bare feet in their main buildings? Of course not. Here we can see their rules in 1906 (from the book).
Rules for Visitors of the Library.
1. It is positively forbidden to spit on the floor or on the heaters.
2. Readers must not put their feet on the furniture.
3. Visitors are not permitted to talk in the reading-rooms, except in communicating with the Attendants.
4. Readers must return all books or periodicals to the Attendant from whom they were procured.
That changed. On their website today, you can see that the Cincinnati Library’s “Standards of Library Behavior” include
Remember
Shoes and shirts are required at all times.
And did kids actually go barefoot in the main library (as opposed to deposit stations)? Sure they did. Here’s another picture.

This photograph of children using the stereoscope machines was taken in the Children’s Room of the “Old Main” library.
[Caption and photo from the Library’s flickr page. Click for larger version.]
And you know what? I bet they never had an injury. And I bet there was never any disturbance caused by those bare feet.
But still, somehow, over the years, they got it put into their heads that bare feet must be banned.
And there are few things worse than a library without a sense of history.
[H/T: Bob Morton]
Madison public library, Wisconsin, 1905:


hi, dear bob neinast – my old bum is back again! you’ve found the great pictures, usefull, funny and exemplary. but there was the normal world where things were normal and barefoot stuff was o’key – and what do you want now?
now we’re living in a hell – i’ve told it to you once (twice? many times?), and i still can’t get you. no boy/girl in the “civilised” and much more worse uncivilised modern world would walk barefoot in their own will – and i’m shure you know it as well as i do.
iphones, all the GADGETS, civilisation in general are what our children and we, adults, have nowdays instead of bare feet EVERYWHERE. and nothing would be changed as this world is standing – you see?
and you – the single (maybe you have some funny careless followers) permanent barefoot person (how about freeezy and snowy winters?), who wants(?) to break the rules of the world of 7 BILLIONS and live naturally in it as our dead (he was killed for his extravagavancy) Porfiriy Ivanoff did – but this freak was not only barefoot but went everythere only in his undees.
now i’m browsing https://www.flickr.com/photos/north-carolina-state-archives/ there’re some interesting phoptos for me and maybe for you.
The single? You need to google-search it. If nothing else, find out about the Society for Barefoot Living (and check out their facebook page, too). And I’m not even a member. There is also the Barefoot Alliance, and a lot of barefoot hiking groups.
Thanks for the links to the N.C. picture archives.
you’re online – the first time i get you online, bob!
just a minute – or ten i’ll compose a message
It’s not everywhere as bad as it seems to be in the USA. I have been barefoot in many European countries and don’t get the constant rejection from restaurants, libraries etc. It’s rather easy to live a 100% barefoot life (if you can cope with the temperatures) if you can live with being the only one. It’s rare but you will usually not be attacked for it, and offended people are a small negligible minority.
for the links to the N.C archives – it’s no problem, i think it’s my duty to share it to the itnerested people.
i’m not your enemy or a competitor, you see, but i’m actually your devoted fan. yes, i am.
I want you, dear Bob, know, that when i was a child, i knew every barefoot thing in its best – warm dust, warm or liquid or freezy mud, snow, even ice, really – and not ’cause we were poor, not at all, i felt it only by my choice.
about all the human’s societies – they are the box of sweets with a pile of shit within it – and i beleive that only individualities, such as me or you could live free in this shit world.
these sites are fetishist sites – whatever they declared. alliance, society, dirtyfeet, etc. – all of them are just wanking sites.
Your ignorance knows no bounds. Have you even looked at the sites I mentioned?
you have banned me permanently? let’s try
that’s ok – bob – happy new year and merry christmas to you and your wife (and your children if they exist). i must confess that there’s a vacancy without you in my soul. i’m sorry – i was drunk and all what i’ve seen on russian dirtyfeet (olga gavva site – they all are fetishists, that’s true) i extended to the universe. i’m sorry. you’re very good guy and i love you.