I have a friend who I’ve talked to about “big justice” and “little justice”. One thing I’ve always had to battle in my lawsuits is the perception that fighting to go barefoot is just “little justice.” Oh, just put on some shoes. Oh, that’s too minor of an insult to fight.
I’ve had courts get mad at me for wasting their time. In my suit against the Columbus Metropolitan Library, I had the trial court judge there admonish me:
In closing, however, the Plaintiff is urged to reconsider the wisdom of continuing this lawsuit. His dispute with the Columbus Metropolitan Library has already been addressed in written decisions by two federal courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States then denied further review. Isn’t that enough? There are other choices for the Plaintiff ranging from allowing himself to wear appropriate foot coverings for the brief times when he is present in a Columbus Metropolitan Library, to simply using another local Library altogether – if there is one having no bare foot policy. This lawsuit is expending precious public resources. Plaintiff should ask himself whether, even if he is right on the law, the time and funds he is causing to be expended to defend the Library Board’s authority could not be much better spent on other proper public purposes in this time of increasingly tight State and local budgets.
(Emphasis added.)
That’s “little justice”. Even if I was right on the law, it was my fault for bringing the suit, and not the fault of the Library for continuing to fight my lawsuit. They could have just settled and expended much less time and funds, and in the end they would not have noticed a bit of difference, aside from having one more satisfied customer.
This is what the famed Gerry Spence (the lawyer for Karen Silkwood, among others) said about it. From an article in the Deseret News in 1984:
The courts have an unwritten rule, [Gerry Spence] said. “Little people must not have big justice. Little people must have little justice.”
I’ve made appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court and to the Ohio Supreme Court. And they make it clear that all they are interested in is “big justice”, cases that affect large numbers of people or are for large sums of money. But if they cannot, will not, address the little injustices, then the rot spreads, for any injustice is ultimately a “big justice”. A civilization that allows it has lost its way.
Let me finish with a part of a near-poem I found about “big justice” and “little justice”, here:
Justice is justice,
There is no concept of little justice or big justice or half gram of justice or one gram of justice!!!
Justice is not sold in carats in international markets,
Justice cannot be sold in grams on shops,
Justice cannot be displayed on shopping malls as ‘the big one’!!!Justice is not a product,
Justice is justice,
Either there is justice or no justice,Little justice is a sign of corruption,
Little justice is an upcoming disaster,Little justice is bribery,
Little justice is weakness,Justice is not a grant,
Justice is not an ‘extra facility’,
Justice is not a privilege,
Justice is not a ‘give and take’,
Justice is not an allowance,Justice is the only available connection among people and society,
Justice is the birth of humanity,
Justice is not an invention,
Justice is the center of all gravities,There is no concept of ‘shortfall’ in justice,
There is no concept of ‘we are trying our best’ in justice,Either you do justice,
Or, you do not do justice,There is no justification for lack of justice,
There is no justification for ‘packets of justice’,Justice is not a manufacturing plant where you manufacture products on your choice,
Justice is not an agricultural land where you cultivate crops on choice,Justice is neither ‘supply and demand’,
Justice is justice,
Either it exists or does not,Nor is Justice a ‘percentage’!!!
‘Ten percent deprived’ means Justice Hundred percent absent,
There is no concept and justification for ten percent injustice,
Of course oxfordians do not have knowledge of that,
But their weak knowledge is not a concept,There is no ideal in mathematics,
Mathematics is either correct or wrong,
Mathematics is pure justice,
Justice is pure mathematics,
Mathematics is everlasting,
Justice is everlasting,Mathematics is always correct,
Justice is always correct,There is no concept of ten percent wrong mathematics,
There is no concept of ten percent injustice,Injustice is the termite for society,
It destroys society from within very silently,
The decoration abruptly collapses,. . . without notice,
Because either there is justice or no justice,Justice is not a piece of art,
That they decorate on walls and tables and rooms,
Justice is not a painting of modern slavery,
Justice is not an art of imperialism,Justice is justice,
Either there is justice or no justice,
It seems that all we ever get is “little justice”, and that translates to no justice at all.
That is a nerve! I realize the judge has the authority to make the decision, but to demean you by saying that you should have bothered “even if you were right about the law”. Ouch! Who is paying this guy’s salary again? I though the law was the law. Apparently it depends on the issue.
Hi, Tim. As I say in the piece, there is “big justice” for the big people and corporations, and little or no justice for us peons. 🙂
Bob, Did you ever try to see if the ACLU would be supportive of any of your lawsuits? I wonder if they would see this as a “little justice” issue or not.
from 1967:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=UAlRAAAAIBAJ&sjid=vcAMAAAAIBAJ&pg=4958,1538118&dq=hippies+barefoot&hl=en
The ACLU did have something to say about it then, with regards to barefoot hippies on planes.
@Dan. Yes, I did. It’s a long story, so I think I’ll tell it another day as a full blog entry.
@Beach Bum. Very interesting. But that was the ACLU of then, not now. (You do a good job of digging this stuff out!)
When people say ‘small stuff’ isn’t important because there are so many ‘big’ issues out there, I generally ask if they mind if someone steals $50 from them. Well of course they do! My next comment, well there are bank robberies, people whose cars get stolen, people whose entire house is ransacked, so why do they mind those $50? Some see the light, others just say that’s ‘completely different’.
Also it’s interesting how many people seem to think we can only put our time into one thing, as if we have to chose *one* cause in our lives and one only… Now I know Bob puts a whole lot of time into this, and I am glad he does, for the reason above, it *is* important. But when often the ‘don’t you have a life’ thing is aimed at those who merely *comment* on the blogs and news articles, I can’t help but wonder how much time these people think this takes. I can type fast, I have sources (proving there are no barefoot driving laws, etc) bookmarked and handy at the click of a mouse, it’s no full-time job. Maybe these ‘get a life’ folks take an hour to ponder over each post they make and then another ten minutes to peck it out with two fingers, but that’s their problem, if so maybe they should consider to do other things for themselves.. 🙂
@Myranya: Regarding the “don’t have a life” thing, what we have is expertise. There was probably some investment early on in gaining the expertise, but from that point on, as you say, it’s easy to share that expertise.
And why not?
[…] In this comment, Dan asked if I ever asked the ACLU for support in my lawsuits. The answer is a long story that I’ve kept procrastinating in telling. […]